Lessons Learned from the 2012 Election

(Cross-posted at National Review Online)

Mitt Romney ran an excellent campaign. I congratulate him on investing in the hard work of leadership rather than living it up in some island paradise. He is an American hero. Regrettably, he was the wrong person to run in a year when the single greatest challenge Republicans could make rested on the repeal of Obamacare. Anti-Obamacare sentiment was enough to elect Scott Brown in Massachusetts. It might well have been enough to put the right Republican over the top nationwide. But Mitt Romney could not make a convincing case against Obama’s law when it so closely resembled his own work in Massachusetts. His federalism distinction was technically accurate, but it made little sense to the typical voter, who just saw an apple that looked like the apple everyone was yelling about.

We may also have learned something about Americans and religion. Romney underperformed McCain by 2 to 3 million votes. That is astonishing. President Obama’s support practically collapsed, as he brought in about 9 million fewer votes than in 2008. Had Romney been able to build on McCain’s overall base, he would probably have won the popular vote and possibly the White House. I can think of a couple of theories to explain Romney’s underperformance in total votes. One is that many conservatives refused to vote for a moderate Northeastern former governor who was the prime catalyst for a huge government health plan in his state. The second theory is less attractive. Many Republican voters may have refused to support a member of the LDS faith.

Third, it is clear Republicans must crack the code of appealing to minorities. They lost African-Americans, as usual. But the GOP also performed terribly with Hispanics and — to my surprise — with Asian-Americans. Somehow, Republicans have ended up on the wrong end of some kind of us v. them notion regarding race that is totally unjustified, but apparently has some currency of perception. This issue may have to become the top priority, because it is by far the best way to change the electoral math. I don’t have the answer here, but it is time for a Manhattan Project for Republicans on breaking down the racial barriers in a durable fashion.

Finally (and related to the third point), I have also concluded that George W. Bush’s “compassionate conservatism” has been the recipient of too much vitriol. In this race, Mitt Romney did not have a rhetorical or programmatic shield to protect him from the usual charge of Republican unconcern for the plight of ordinary Americans (and minority Americans). George W. Bush’s campaign was able to argue effectively for the role of civil society in addressing the problems of those who fall behind. In Britain, David Cameron argued from similar premises with his Big Society (as opposed to Big Government) and became prime minister. Back in Bush’s first term, I can recall NPR liberals complaining about the compelling nature of the conservative social-science arguments on the ability of marriage and family to blunt social pathologies, increase economic mobility, and break cycles of poverty. I didn’t hear many of those arguments this time around. I think it is time to revisit them.


5 thoughts on “Lessons Learned from the 2012 Election

  1. Dr. Baker, I heard you on the radio the other night, and I love it when I come across people like you who are speaking with an educated mind and truth in your heart. It (the truth, and your use of it) is like a life raft in a sea of unknowns. You are appreciated. Keep up the good work.

  2. Meanwhile one fact checker counted or tabulated over 900 times in which Romney told a lie. But I guess he had a “liberal” bias.
    And speaking of George W Bush apparently none of the usual “conservative” talking heads considered it at all odd that George was strangely no where to be seen during the recent campaign.
    Meanwhile I quite like this assessment of the Bush mis-administration.
    Plus in my opinion based on the assessment of a Spiritual philosopher who was acutely aware of the state of the collective USA body politic, the 8 years of the Bush mis-administration were easily the worst 8 years in USA history – such is of course the toxic legacy that Barack Obama inherited.
    Never mind too that what is now called “conservative” in the USA is effectively a form of collective psychosis.

  3. Frederick, you leave comments that are almost meaningless. I mean, good grief, the Bush administration was worse than the Civil War? Worse than the Great Depression? Worse than WWII? Worse than Vietnam? Your judgment is put in question by these kinds of silly remarks.

Comments are closed.